proof of qr
Quantum-Relativity 103
absent a correct understanding of relativity, then all other physical observation can represent nothing more than perfectly unadulterated claptrap.
Einstein naively attempted to retain the classical notion of spatial displacement as being a property of the Universe that is independent of time, with only one tiny little snag of course, no time - no space. In 1919, Eddington proves to him that his general theory is perfectly correct in describing the nature of space-time in close solar approach. What my dear (posthumous) colleague did then was so insane that it simply beggar's belief; he ceased all further work upon the subject of relativity.
My colleague must be highly commended for declaring the subject of relativity to be unfathomable. One cannot be quite so polite about his adoring fan club who failed to pay any attention to Einstein, let alone understand why he saw his subject as unfathomable. Einstein "mined" for me, deep into the solid "rock" of almost impossible logic for fourteen long hard lonely years, he exposed the very motherload of all gravitational reason, touched it briefly without any Newtonian cognition, and then just walked away; now please pay great attention.
My colleague must be highly commended for declaring the subject of relativity to be unfathomable. One cannot be quite so polite about his adoring fan club who failed to pay any attention to Einstein, let alone understand why he saw his subject as unfathomable. Einstein "mined" for me, deep into the solid "rock" of almost impossible logic for fourteen long hard lonely years, he exposed the very motherload of all gravitational reason, touched it briefly without any Newtonian cognition, and then just walked away; now please pay great attention.
Unfortunately, my dear colleague held a relativistically-illogical concept of time.
In all relativity work, we must avoid the (classical) mind-trap that poor Einstein fell into of thinking of past events as fixed in time and of our present as moving forward in time, because of course relativity only comes out properly if we use the observer's frame of space-time reference. In relativity, the observer's time does not move forward, his view of history moves backwards in time from his fixed point of reference. Proof: Clauser and Freedman, 1972.
My dear colleague had passed away, 17-years earlier. Had my colleague survived for long enough, then there should be little doubt that he would have given us what I now call Quantum-Relativity
by about 1975, but Einstein was twenty years in his grave by that time and by then my dearest Newton had been dead for 248-years already.
Author's comment:
Our absurd "naked-cosmological-Emperors" must take their "men-of-gravity" as they actually find them and not just go forcing the pieces. After 1972, all work should have come to a halt, then I would have stepped in and sorted things out. The decision to carry on with Cosmology after 1972 was not only bat-mess insane, it was basically nothing more than a gigantic intellectual fraud; a kind of huge confidence trick in which the naked-Emperors played themselves out for the greatest clown-fest of mug-punter nit-wits that the Earth has ever seen.
Take care here; with this next move, things start to become a bit tougher.
The above expression is valid for all finite positive ts. I will now provide an expression for td
which seems to be insane. In other words, it seems to be complete nonsense. However, the spatial expression that I will give for td
is actually valid, but only for vanishingly small delta-td. Later we will find that both td
and ts
become replaced by t-prime and that the t-prime components later become self-cancelling. So, the invalidity of the expression for substantive values of td
becomes irrelevant. We are looking for the fundamental relationship between space and time here and once we have done that for vanishingly small increments of it, the vanishingly small space-time solution must remain valid for all of past finite space-time. Think of your "speed-of-light" as being like the first time derivative of space-time, we seek to find that magic first time derivative of Universal space-time. Once that understanding is achieved, the entire Universe must become our oyster and a grand universal space-time field theory that is valid for the entire past-Universe will be just a few more minutes of work away from us.
Maxwell’s notional wave is the dual of Bohr’s actual energy-particle or quanta, this quantum-particle and wave duality tells us that so-called “speed-of-light” or more correctly, the apparent wave-velocity.
The so-called "speed-of-light" is just one second of space per second of imaginary historic depth. If in any doubt about this, just ask the CIPM about their formal definition of a metre and you will find that it is 3.335.. ns (of light-flight which can be restated as "time of quanta in transit"). The concept that space is actually time was formally adopted by the global physics community, and the CIPM of course, in about 1980. So, "c-squared" is simply minus-one, that rather changes everything of course. No wonder that relativity was so unfathomable for Einstein. Let us find out what can be rescued from this silly little misunderstanding; it turns out that everything can be rescued of course, except for the "dark-energy". (Please see my footnote #4)
Gauss-Newton Quantum-Relativity-102 , the second lesson
If one is not deeply interested in this arcane subject, and if one is not, then one has the author's hearty congratulations because this subject matter is as dry as ditchwater. If that is the case, then please just skip through these next seven paragraphs completely and simply click on the button shown above. For the ten-minute tour of quantum-relativity, we now know enough to move on backwards from lesson 103, back into lesson # quantum-relativity-102.
The Primary 3d Functional Integration.
At first glance, the blue box is only showing us the wave-velocity, but that is actually also showing us the first time-derivative of Universal space-time. Now, all we need to do is to integrate that first time-derivative for all of Universal space-time using Einstein's excellent General Theory of Relativity and then bingo, the entire Universe will become our oyster. Well, the entire Universe would be a bit too hard for us, to put that rather mildly. So, we must start with just a single free-proton of matter. Even a single free-proton was too hard for me in three-dimensions at first. So, I integrated over a two-dimensional sectional model of a single free-proton, converted that into three dimensions and then bingo, the shape of the entire Universe became blooming obvious. It seems to be impossible to depict a three-dimensional shape with an infinite fourth dummy dimension onto a two-dimensional sketch. So, I only ever depict this infinite three plus one-dimensional shape using my original two-dimensional sectional model of the near-proton tight-space.
A Bit of History
That was six years ago, but that was no help to anyone at all except for myself, because I struggled to find a way to explain something so pathetically simple without calling out the implied narcisism, which never works of course. We had all been led into an intelectual trap since Maxwell, who was all over the correct solution like a rash, passed away at the unlikely early age of only 48. Why did I not come forward in 1972? I was compelled not to do that by forces that were far beyond me to understand. I became diverted into improving my human-mind model that explained the strength of the observed mind-blindness. I started on this model way back in 1962.
The Meta-Cybernetic Model
(of any generic mammalian mind).
Why does an electrical engineer turned meta-cybernetician (a common cybernetician's psychiatric counsellor), want to waste any of his time on this strange material in the first place? Because it demonstrates the power of the meta-cybernetic model of the individual (and shared societal) generic mammalian mind. It forms into a very powerful, if not an extremely tedious, individual case study demonstration of the power of meta-cybernetically empowered thinking.
The meta-cybernetic model shows the individual (myself in this example) that all of existing thinking in the complex numerical plane needs to move over to what I now call the FNN plane. It also shows us how all physicists (ex-Maxwell, Bohr and followers) have been completely misled by a catastrophically incompetent description of number theory.
Should one wish to understand how a single individual like Galileo, can change our thinking about space forever, then one requires the meta-cybernetic model of the mind to explain what was going on in the minds of everybody else, before Galileo caused a general "wake-up-call" to happen. After that change, the individual does not wish to contact his prior insanity, he just says; "I am human, humans make mistakes”. The meta-cybernetic model shows how all human thinking embeds mistakes that become invisible upon the general unquestioning adoption of the mistaken idea. It forces the meta-cybernetician to think outside of the box all of the time, not just when someone like Galileo forces him to or he is scared into sloppy wet jelly by his own imminent demise.
The meta-cybernetic model shows the individual (myself in this example) that all of existing thinking in the complex numerical plane needs to move over to what I now call the FNN plane. It also shows us how all physicists (ex-Maxwell, Bohr and followers) have been completely misled by a catastrophically incompetent description of number theory.
Should one wish to understand how a single individual like Galileo, can change our thinking about space forever, then one requires the meta-cybernetic model of the mind to explain what was going on in the minds of everybody else, before Galileo caused a general "wake-up-call" to happen. After that change, the individual does not wish to contact his prior insanity, he just says; "I am human, humans make mistakes”. The meta-cybernetic model shows how all human thinking embeds mistakes that become invisible upon the general unquestioning adoption of the mistaken idea. It forces the meta-cybernetician to think outside of the box all of the time, not just when someone like Galileo forces him to or he is scared into sloppy wet jelly by his own imminent demise.
We Will Always Make Fools of Ourselves where we Encourage our own Gullibility.
Want to learn a load of utterly perfect tripe? Easy then, just learn and adopt anybody else's teaching without deep forensic questioning of every single jot of it. Want to avoid buying the Eiffel Tower from Victor Lustig? Almost impossible, listen to your own wife's skepticism, he says that he is a corrupt French-official, highly believable, corrupt and French-official are virtually the same word. Lustig was almost too good for any mark that he had preselected for gullible tendencies. Want to learn more about Newton and classical mechanics? Then you just need to read my next paragraph.
Newton and the Gauss-Newton Quantum Relativity.
Within the Gauss-Newton Quantum-Relativity, the “classical” label is moved to the Maxwellian time-form and the Newtonian time-form is labelled as “inverted-quantum-relativity.” This is very unfair on Newton, because he did warn us that the selection of the positive forward going time convention was potentially incorrect. The alternative is to regard time as the passage of history back into the past. The arbitrary choice of the positive forward going time convention makes no difference in classical mechanics. Newton chose the simplest, while warning us to be aware of the opposite possibility. Unfortunately, Newton delivered those lectures into empty lecture halls, so it made no difference in any case. Newton did not care if nobody came to his lectures, but he did fear his enemies, so his trusty personal man-servant had to be there as his witness. Want a "laugh a minute"? Then study Newton, the deeper one goes into his story, the more comical it all becomes. Well, comedy for Newton and for myself of course, very embarrassing indeed for all of our worthy "friends-of-mathematics"; all of those fine "naked-mathematical-Emperors" left standing out there.
The Gauss-Newton Quantum-Relativity
delivering the final grand reconciliation between quantum-physics and classical-mechanics (GUT)
de-mystifying quantum entanglement
