Einstein and Sanity
Einstein was great man, but he said that:
“the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
FALSE: Failing to appreciate what is obvious must seem like insanity, but actually one should describe that as mind-blindness. Was some great inventor insane in the time leading up to an important new discovery? No, but prior to that he had been blind to it. We must, by definition, always be mind-blind to our own mind-blindness.
He got himself outside of the "classical Matrix" and then found himself utterly isolated, still trapped by an outer logical mind-cage. He failed to ever describe this outer cage, even to himself, let alone to others. He died alone, a lost and unhappy fellow.
Einstein, and everybody else since, has spent their whole lives failing to explain how an atomic-matter-frame's space-time becomes scaled within a gravitational scale-compression-field. What did Einstein go on repeating for his entire career, while he failed to explain atomic-matter-frame gravitational spatial-scalability? The answer is trivial; he went on using the metre as his yardstick of spatial displacement, as if space, independent of time, meant anything at all. Unfortunately, although we can all far too easily understand the concept of a still 3-d picture, no such thing actually exists in nature. In nature, there is no such article as a frozen object. While a close approximation to what we call a metre must seem to us to exist, in order to make progress beyond Einstein's excellent work with The General Theory, we will now need to go a little deeper than that into understanding the actual metrics of space.
please click on the qr-physics logo to read more
